Are Recovery Steps Clearly Defined for Incidents?¶
Type: DeepDive
Category: Non-functional
Audience: SREs, platform engineers, on-call responders, incident managers
đ What This Perspective Covers¶
Incidents are inevitable.
But how much damage they causeâand how long it lastsâdepends on whether the team knows what to do next.
This perspective checks whether your system has recovery steps documented, accessible, and tested under pressure.
Situations That Demand Runbooks
- Downtime caused by DB overload or network partition
- Stuck background jobs, retries, or event queue buildup
- Misconfig or flag change leading to user-visible errors
- Service-to-service dependency failure with cascade risk
- Authentication/authorization outages blocking access
â ď¸ Failure Patterns¶
- Only senior devs know how to fix certain issues
- Steps to restart a subsystem require tribal knowledge
- Manual fixes are risky, undocumented, or error-prone
- No clear timeline for response or escalation
- On-call fatigue due to repeated âfigure-it-outâ recoveries
â Smarter Incident Recovery Design¶
- Write playbooks: if X fails, do Y (with context and safety tips)
- Store runbooks with version control and team-wide access
- Include not just âwhatâ to do but âwhyâ it matters
- Automate common diagnostics or partial recovery steps
- Review runbooks after incidentsâtreat them as living artifacts
đ§ Principle¶
Recovery is not just reaction.
Itâs practiced response under pressure.
â FAQ¶
-
Q: Isnât every incident unique?
A: Yes. But most share patterns. Good runbooks guideânot replaceâthinking. -
Q: Where should runbooks live?
A: Wherever your on-call responders will find them in 30 seconds or less.