Do You Know Why This Design Exists?¶
Type: Structure
Category: Common
Audience: Reviewer / Lead Architect / Any Engineer Who Has Ever Said âIt Works, I Guessâ
â This Isnât About Best Practices¶
Every system is a graveyard of decisions.
What worked once may break tomorrowâand what breaks may never be blamed on the real cause.
This isnât a checklist item.
Itâs a survival instinct.
đ What Weâre Really Asking¶
- Why this approach, and not the others?
- What trade-offs did you consciously accept?
- If someone replaces this tomorrow, will they know what not to break?
đ§ Patterns That Save You Later¶
- You wrote: âThis design minimizes write amplification at the cost of occasional staleness.â
â That one sentence just saved someone 3 days of debugging. - You noted the alternative: âWe didnât go with Option B due to memory constraints in multi-tenant scaling.â
â That tells ops, PM, and future-you something valuable.
â ď¸ When Itâs Missing¶
- Design becomes cargo culted. No one knows why it exists, so no one knows when it can die.
- Reviewers canât give meaningful feedback. Thereâs no context to push against.
- The system survivesâbut its reasons rot away.
â FAQ¶
-
Q: Isnât this just documentation?
A: No. Documentation explains what. This explains why. Different species. -
Q: Canât people figure it out from code?
A: Not when theyâre stressed. Or new. Or not you.
đ Related Perspectives¶
- [All perspectives are expected to reference design justification.]